I hope you took the opportunity to make a snow angel or two over the holidays......
Wishing you the best in 2013!
Smart Learning - Susan Close, Judy Street and Anita Berekoff visit our division...
January 16 - Caroline School
January 17 - Caroline School
January 18 - Kindergarten teachers - Lochearn Elementary School 8:30
- SmartLearning Action Research Team - Division Office 9-3:30
Year in review: 10 most-tweeted education posts"The business of secondary school is not to wow students with mysticism, it’s to inspire them to pursue study in things that they didn’t even know existed months prior"http://shawncornally.com/wordpress/?p=3180A model for teaching physics:- Play. Give them some materials, an idea, or whatever, and let them play with it. You should watch like a zookeeper watches the gibbons.
- Formalize the play. Give them a task based on the results of the play. Fix this. Is that always true? How many can you make? Is there a pattern…
- Direct Instruction. Show them how their formalization matches up with a commonly accepted model. This may be a book, pedia de la wiki, some expert, whatever. Do an exemplar problem.
- Ask a better question. Now that we have some agency with the material. Have the students build something or ask something that really throws a wrench or demands to be asked. Report these results on white boards.
- Practice, maybe. Now the students can choose to do practice to further precipitate the ideas. I let them choose from mountains of problems I have on my website. Do a couple of the most enjoyable problems with the class at the board.
CARC Session for junior and senior high school Science teachers - register at
https://www.consortiapd.com/ei4/cm.esp?id=15033&pageid=_37S0OXEJ5&showpage=coursedet&child=yes&parentpage=calendar&eiscript=3FD3AET0J&course=120228SCI07 Feb 28: Moving from Traditional Cookbook to Inquiry Based InvestigationsThursday, February 28, 2013 Time:9:00am - 3:30pm Fee: Red Deer $ 30.00
Course Overview:This full day workshop is designed to visit the different levels of inquiry through some hands-on activities and discussion. As the four levels of inquiry are discussed - time will be utilized to take some of the current labs you are using, and converting these to have a higher level of inquiry. Inquiry is advocated for by the Alberta Learning curriculums as it recognizes that inquiry will increase a student's involvement and recognize that there are multiple ways of knowing and determining an outcome. This active engagement through inquiry creates a more meaningful acquisition of knowledge that the students will be able to share with the world and also gain the skills needed to design their own inquiry approaches. This workshop is suitable for all science teachers in division 3 and 4. Our hands on activities are designed for teachers to experience some of the wonder and often frustrations when exposed to the highest level of inquiry and then taking these findings and helping to re-vamp their own investigations into exercises that students will gain greater inquiry skills through.Required Materials:Lap Top, Clothing that is safe in a lab, digital/hard copies of labs that you are currently using and wish to take time to adapt a higher level of inquiry within.Venue:River Glen School 4210 59 St. Red Deer
Instructors:
David GowansSusanne CzentyeCheck out Shelly Wright's blog -
I Used to think........http://shelleywright.wordpress.com/
"I used to think that content was the most important thing I could teach. What was I thinking? In a Google world, most of the content I once valued so highly can be accessed in seconds, making the role of content provider obsolete. Now I think skills, like collaboration, critical thinking, and being able to locate rich, reliable information are much more important. So now I use content to teach skills. I’m a skills provider."
Boyshttp://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/finding_common_ground/2013/01/how_to_create_a_boy-friendly_school.htmlTransforming a school to be more learner-focused certainly places classroom instruction at the center of the initiative. But that's not enough. We have to look at all levels and layers of the organization with a critical eye for "what works" and "what doesn't work" when it comes to serving boys. Too often boys run aground or bump up against age-old institutional practices that were never created with an eye for how they will affect boys versus girls. Start with an open and honest dialogue with staff that focuses on some key school-wide questions:
• When your school staff describes the "ideal student," does that description sound more like a girl than a boy?
• Do teachers take away recess as a form of punishment? What is the nature of the zero tolerance policy?
• Who is being referred to special education and what are the primary reasons?
• What percentage of class time is dedicated to lecture as opposed to more active approaches to learning? If you use a block schedule, do teachers teach differently during the block periods?
• Does your school respond to missed homework with zeroes in the gradebook or insist that the work gets done, even if it's late?
• What percent of grades are based on compliance versus content mastery?
• To what extent are students allowed to direct their own learning and/or to incorporate their out-of-school interests?
• How might the physical environment of the classrooms and common areas be made more conducive for boys?
• What does your school do to increase students' exposure to positive male role models?
• In what ways do teachers create personal connections with boys - especially the disengaged, angry or resistant boy?
• How might your school's time-honored ways of doing things be getting in the way of boys' success?
"Responding to the learning styles of boys will help a school become more effective in meeting the needs of all students - including the girls."image credit http://www.mentoringboys.com/boy_smarts.html